Do We Know HOW to fight climate change?

Ok we’ve finally agreed to get serious in the battle against climate change. Do we know HOW?

The top 10 lists are welcome, according to the first few backers of my new book. When I started interviewing experts about climate change more than 15 years ago, I didn’t have any idea what were the priorities; so I asked.

Years later, after hundreds of interviews I’m finding out that other people are like me. They know we have a problem. They know we all have to participate. The question is, HOW?

They agree the information on the best action steps is valuable so they can help fight climate change, save money on their bills, and maybe even cash in a bit on the clean tech revolution.

So based on the early feedback from my backers, I’ve created the new promo below for my new book, video app and kickstarter campaign. Please visit the campaign using the book title “STEP-BY-STEP HOW TO BEAT CLIMATE CHANGE” at Please also share the link with your friends. Thanks for your support.

New top 10 promo small


It’s time for shameless promotion of an important project

OK I’m sure I’m breaking all the rules of social media, online marketing, etc., but it’s time for me to promote something that I’ve been working on for 15 years and is obviously very close to my heart.

You see we don’t really need to talk any more about what we’re doing wrong with climate change. Now we need a step-by-step how-to guidebook to do things right.

People who know me are aware that I’ve built a career as a green journalist and videographer, interviewing experts on clean technologies, green government policies and global energy economics. Now I’ve started a book, a video app and a kickstarter site to get some momentum and some attention in the right places.

Climate change how-to guide


I’m doing it because I care about the planet and I believe you do too. And also of course because it’s a career –So there’s some self-interest (or more accurately self-preservation, I’m not getting rich). Regarding your self interest: Click on the project and arrange to download your Top 10 List and you will no longer feel like you’re not really sure what we should do first, what will make the most impact, how you can personally benefit from the coming clean tech business bonanza, and so on.

I’m announcing it now and doing it now because we seriously need it now. World leaders and corporations know we’re running out of time and are finally ready to stop asking: “Should we fight climate change?” They are finally asking instead: “HOW should we fight climate change?”

Please don’t take this the wrong way, but in my online and real world travels around the climate change world I’ve found lots of really great people with valuable information that answers this question. But I’ve found way more people who just don’t have a clue. It’s my personal mission in life to connect the former with the latter and spread the climate change solution gospel.


3 top 10s cropped 222

I’m using TOP 10 LISTS (backed by solid detailed research and expert opinions) because I’m trying to do it in a very easy-to-read way (with easy to view videos); because there are just too many people telling us that it’s complicated, when it’s not. It’s formidable and challenging and requires the commitment of us all; but it’s not that complicated. The experts and I have compiled different TOP 10 LISTS for different people such as homeowners, business owners, policymakers, city planners, corporate executives, teachers, media people, stand-up comics, community organizers, etc. We have all the solutions we need to meet the challenge. We just need more of what everybody on the planet has to give: political will.

So please go look at this project and take action now to become part of the solution.

Despicable corporate crime by Volkswagen

Volkswagen created a software program that turned on pollution controls only when the car was being tested for pollution controls; as a result, millions of VWs have been polluting up to 40 times the legal limit for the past seven years. And although they have stopped selling them this way, Volkswagen has not announced a recall. This can only be described as disgusting corporate criminal activity.

They are the worst kind of cheaters, arrogant, hypocritical and misleading in their advertising. What kind of a sick mind could even conceive such a trick? How stupid is the management that it let this go on for seven years? Heads must roll throughout the management ranks, hefty fines and imprisonment must be meted out. No deals from the EPA. Everyone, please sell your shares. Everyone else, please sue Volkswagen for damages.

They have cheated their shareholders by destroying the brand, chiselled their competitors by avoiding the product development investments others made, ripped off their customers, selling them something that’s now nearly worthless, wreaked untold damage on Germany’s previously stellar reputation for clean tech, engineering excellence and integrity, and they owe the rest of us any money they have left for the damage they have done to our only home, the planet Earth. I have absolutely no sympathy for the Volkswagen management team. The more brutal the punishments the better. I expect it will destroy the company; and it should. There are undoubtedly good people who work there who have also been betrayed. Sadly, they should get their resumés in order now.

Unfortunately this is the ugliest example of green washing I’ve seen and it serves as a reminder that sometimes the market cannot be trusted to do anything but think about short term profits and bonuses. That’s why governments must make interventions into the market relating to issues like climate change. We must have strong regulations, a price on carbon and unmitigated punishment for despicable corporate crimes, like those committed by Volkswagen.

When will petitions become class action lawsuits?


This year environmental groups all over the world are collecting millions of signatures on petitions to bring to the Paris climate talks in December. The intention is to prove that ordinary people want their governments to act quickly and seriously. We expect, perhaps naively, that government people who want to be re-elected will see the writing on the wall and will get serious with climate change.

What if those signatures were on class action lawsuits instead? Environmental lawyers are now finding numerous ways to punish governments and polluters who together seem to collude to destroy the only home we have without repercussions. An example is another recent landmark ruling in The Hague, that found that the Dutch government has a duty to protect its citizens from climate change. The old argument that a government can blame neighbouring governments and thus shirk its responsibilities was thrown out.

While we bring our petitions, governments will use the Paris photo op to make great pronouncements about their intentions, then return home and try to implement a plan. Some will intervene in their domestic economy and build strength, creating jobs through the clean tech bonanza. Others will continue to be manipulated by the big fossil fuel companies and drag their feet, being left behind by the rest of the world both environmentally and economically. Someone needs to pay for this environmental and economic neglect of citizens. It might be time for environment groups to create a different kind of carbon bubble, based on class action lawsuits as a first step toward ever more severe punishment.

Here’s the link to the Dutch story.

Momentum Toward a New Energy Age – Nails in the Carbon Coffin

Warren Buffett & Al GoreI recently got promoted with Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project organization and finally got to meet him. It was a special day as he is, of course, an idol of mine. This happened at a big training session for 600 more Canadian Climate Leaders (8000+ in the world) held last week in Toronto.

My personal agenda aside, the hope is that this group becomes obsolete soon. We work on educating the public and creating momentum, as the world shifts into the new energy age. We’re still probably decades from a full shift, but momentum is definitely ramping up. A few recent developments in the news may have more impact than we will (but we’re working as hard as ever on educating our world).


Warren Buffet, iconic American billionaire investor recently pulled his money out of oil and invested about a billion dollars in solar. This is really important for momentum because although the investment trends have been going this way, Buffet is more than a person. He’s a larger-than-life icon for the investment world. His move is a signal to investors everywhere, that the time to make the shift to new energy technology is now. A good analysis of why he did this can be found here.

Similarly but negatively, a few years ago, T. Boone Pickens, another iconic billionaire, started backing natural gas fracking in a big way, causing a huge investment shift into that business. This was very unfotunate. Not only did it do nothing for greenhouse gas emissions and wreck a lot of landscapes, but it was a myth built on weak profit numbers, created for political reasons (expensive mid-east wars, energy independence etc.) We now know that fracking wells peak in a few years and that fracking cannot make money when the oil price drops below $80. And we still don’t know completely what vile chemicals they are pumpiing at very high pressure down towards our fresh water aquifers.


In its own way the fracking debacle may end up doing some good. Buffet and others are finally seeing that coal, gas and oil either have no future, or are just too political and volatile for investment gambits. Renewables, on the other hand, are becoming increasingly positive. The technology is proven, you can build it fast, and now the economics are fabulous. For example, solar just hit 4 cents per kilowatt in an important utility bid in Austin, Texas. Nothing can touch this, not natural gas, not even cheap old coal.

It’s time for everyone, investors, homeowners, business owners, corporate executives, urban planners, government policy people, developers, etc. to get on the clean tech bandwagon and slam the last few nails into the carbon coffin.

The Economist reports scientific proof that severe weather is going to rise exponentially

The cautious skeptics at the Economist Newspaper continue to move their general position away from default conservative approaches. Last week the publication reported that “scientists are now able to say that climate change increases the risk of a particular weather pattern by a measurable amount and, in some cases, that a particular episode is almost impossible to imagine without global warming.” Green blog re economist pic It quotes credible scientists at Oxford University, University of Melbourne, the Natioanal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the USA and the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute. It notes that it is still difficult to connect individual weather events to climate change, but the science is growing quickly linking man-made climate change to patterns of dramatically increasing severe weather occurrances. The Economist: “In an attempt to give the overall picture, a new study in Nature Climate Change by Erich Fischer and Reto Knutti, both of the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, moved away from individual events to consider heatwaves and rain storms in general. They took all the heat and precipitation extremes between 1901 and 2005, defining extremes as events likely to occur once every 1,000 days. By running the climate models with and without climate change, they found that 0.85°C of warming (the rise since the industrial era began) has made such heat extremes four or five times more likely, roughly the same as in the Australian study. The authors attribute 75% of the heat extremes, and 18% of the precipitation extremes, to observed global warming. Worryingly, the risk of an extreme event seems to rise exponentially as mean temperatures creep up. The probability of a heat extreme is twice as great at 2°C of warming than at 1.5°C…That is a useful addition to climate science. People are routinely told about—and routinely ignore—the bad things they are doing to the climate. The attribution studies show that the climate is doing bad things back.”

It’s important when cautious, skeptical and credible publications like the Economist acknowledge truths that they know are especially bad news for carbon-based players in the global economy. The worm is definitely turning. Here’s the link: The Economist

Everyone should watch this

Professionally, I’m a commercial writer and videographer, so although I wish everyone on earth would  click on the picture below and watch the whole video, I know most people won’t; because its 18 minutes long.Elon Musk Powerwall

So I’ll try to tell you about it in a few sentences. It’s a presentation by Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, the electric car people. He’s unveiling two products: A home battery system that you hang on your wall and an industrial battery system, that big organizations can use for more demanding needs than a residential home.

The home battery can be ordered today for $3500. A big enough home solar panel system is still a bit expensive to install, but as many people know, these costs have dropped by more than 80% in the past 5 years and will continue dropping. It’s similar with electric cars, they still cost more than most of us can afford, but that is changing really quickly too. Tesla is right now building a massive battery factory in Nevada, which Musk says is the first of many that will be built by his company and others, all over the world. So batteries for solar-panel-homes and home charging of electric cars will soon be accessible to a lot more people in ordinary income brackets. Electric vehicle makers are right now quickly eliminating long distance concerns and the other worries we have about them.

This home battery announcement is further proof that the world is going to change big time, despite all the BS that status quo industries pay lobbyists to shovel at us. So in addition to making our planet healthier, it is now really starting to make economic sense for ordinary people to shift more to electricity and away from fossil fuels.

Energy politics & economics update

My last post suggested oil prices would rebound, but obviously I underestimated how determined certain countries are to use the oil price as a weapon. There is all kinds of speculation, including the suggestion that the once powerful OPEC group wants to hurt the USA natural gas industry and the Russians at the same time. They have loads of cash, so they don’t care how long it takes to inflict the damage they are seeking. It’s all a little complicated and in a few decades will be irrelevant.

The good news is that the growth in investment in our renewables future APPEARS to continue unabated by the availability of cheap oil and gas. According to Bloomberg total clean energy investment jumped 16%  in 2014, to $310bn (£205bn). China led the trend with growth of 32%. Of course most of this was before the oil price collapse; however it also took place during a period when a lot of government subsidies for renewables disappeared, or were reduced. In addition, China and the US reached an agreement this past November that says China will increase its non-fossil fuel energy consumption to 20% within 15 years; and the USA will reduce emissions by 26-28% below its 2005 level by 2025. Republicans in the USA will try to prevent this in the short term, but unfortunately for them, China and the rest of the world will ignore them, creating a global competitive imperative within 10 years or so.

I’m trying to paint a rosy picture here but the realist in the dark corner of my brain is screaming out that we should expect some difficulty for clean tech investment during 2015 and perhaps 2016.  Governments will continue to move into renewables for centralized power. I think distributed solar will continue to grow in places where it is already growing quickly. But inroads into new market regions will be delayed, while cheap natural gas remains abundant. Everything is exaggerated. Low oil prices will hurt but not cripple the fracking business. On the other hand the fracking business probably is making more of its productivity gains than it should.

In the long run coal and uranium-based nuclear are more or less certain to expire, but in both cases it will take a long long time to reach their end. Oil and gas will likely live on forever, but their global dominance will dissipate within a few decades. I still believe that the march toward a green future is unstoppable, but it will march more quickly when oil and gas are expensive again.

Let’s not panic about oil prices

Every time the price of oil drops dramatically people get into a tizzy. They think it will hurt the economy. They shouldn’t. Environmentalists think it will threaten the growth of alternative energy. They shouldn’t worry either.

crude price hist 5 yrs 333

First, for my fellow oil-loving Canadians who think they have all kinds of problems; well you do, but the oil price drop isn’t really serious. If you look at this chart you can see that the price of oil has grown steadily over the past 5 years. Sure it’s had its ups and downs -like in 2011- when it went for a big swing. That’s probably all that’s happening right now.

Second for my fellow environmentalists, we worry when the oil price goes up because it makes it more profitable for oil people, who seem to care more about profits than public safety and environmental damage. We also worry when the oil price goes down because we think it threatens the current march to cost parity (see map) that is taking place worldwide for solar.


Similar maps can be drawn now for wind, geothermal and other clean technologies by the way; so quit worrying. The game is basically ending for oil. It’s like participating in a game of monopoly and knowing you just don’t have a way to win, but it would be rude to stop playing.

So the oil people are quietly investing in wind power in Texas, trying to figure a way out of unprofitable fracking, and hiring fewer lobbyists to try to attack climate science. The USA, UK, Canada and Australia are the only four countries left in the world where the media is gullible enough to take these lobbyists seriously anyway. That will completely end soon.

Environmentalists should look at the big picture. When oil goes way up or way down it demonstrates to homeowners and businesses how volatile and unpredictable oil is and how conservation technologies and clean energy technologies are starting to look pretty good by comparison.

This whole mythology about wind and solar being somehow less reliable because they are a little intermittent is now being reviewed by serious players in less inflamed tones, with new smart grid technologies and new electricity storage solutions now helping to dispel one of the few arguments oil and coal people have left.

Nonetheless, having said all of this about the arguments for clean tech, the transformation challenge is huge. Clean tech investment is easily kicking butt everywhere and growth of solar and other renewables is staggering compared with past growth; but it is not staggering when measured against the world scenario. Non-hydro renewables are well under 10% of the worldwide energy scene. So we have a long way to go. But at least the argument is over.

All that’s left to do is to worry about the volatility of oil and start changing all our systems to clean, reliable renewables.

Seven New Developments that Reveal a Quickly Changing World Energy Economy

There is a perfect global economic storm developing for accelerated renewables growth led by the solar industry. Please consider these  7 developments.

1. The most recent Chinese parliament session opened with the announcement that pollution is the country’s number one challenge; and the determination to solve it. According to the Economist Magazine an inordinate degree of emphasis and time was spent on the topic.

2. Solar is no longer seen as unproven by mainstream America. About 200,000 U.S. homes and businesses added rooftop solar in the past two years alone –equivalent to four or five conventionally-sized coal plants.

3. Despite reductions worldwide in incentives, solar growth will be in double digits every year for the next few decades and renewables will power half of North America within about 25 years.

4. In 43 states, governments and utilities are struggling to sort out the solar net metering mess, with utilities usually resisting at first, then planning strategies to redefine themselves. The courts help this process with judgements against any gouging grid charges, so the utilities have no choice but to invest in new-world grid upgrades and highly profitable roles as installer/financiers.

An administrative law judge in Minnesota ruled recently that distributed solar arrays were a more cost-effective resource than natural gas to meet Xcel Energy’s peak power needs. According to, “If solar trumps gas for peaking power in Minnesota, there’s little reason to be building new natural gas peaking capacity anywhere in the country (See link below for complete detail on this new reality).“

tesla gigafactory

5. Apple and Tesla are planning the largest battery factory in the world, to be built on American soil and to manufacture batteries for cars, phones and electronics on an unprecedented scale (the plant is to be accompanied by a solar farm and largely powered by it).

6. The journal Nature is reporting that Harvard researchers have now proven a design for a flow battery using organic molecules instead of metals at $27 per kilowatt hour compared with $81+ for the best vanadium-based system. Because it is organic it offers unprecedented flexibility for designing each battery ideally to its application and also offers the real likelihood of further cost reductions.

7. The carbon industry’s last great hope, the politically manufactured shale gas miracle, is a bust, with increasing evidence that the wells’ peak production comes within a few years, disproving their business cases, and verifying that actual lifecycle costs and environmental costs of natural gas will keep it from competing with renewables in the very near future.

Once digital cameras were commercialized, the experts in the photo business expected the transition to take 20 years, but the tipping point was reached in a few years and the total transition took about  6 years. This kind of momentum is now about to happen in solar/renewables.

The Russia/Ukraine/Europe economic gas squabble is just one more example of the stupidity of extractive dependence. Carbon fuels are being battered worldwide. Extreme weather is too obvious now. Lobbying cannot defeat economics/pragmatics/the will of the internet-connected people. The carbon fuel industry is quickly becoming a dinosaur. Please click here and read this important article about solar vs. natural gas. Solar wins on immediate cost, future cost stability, job creation, infrastructure and reliability.

Extreme Weather Alert for the Next…100 Years?

Last week at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago, Jennifer Francis, a research professor at Rutgers University said Arctic ice is disappearing because of too much greenhouse gas, weakening the jet stream and creating more extreme weather.

Acrtic sea ice 333 melts 1984-2012av temp since 1881 & hottest yearsMore hurricanes, floods, severe ice storms, droughts that threaten the food supply; windier, hotter, colder, wetter, dryer. Extremes. The atmosphere around our planet that keeps us alive is razor thin and the ecological balance is very fragile. We are screwing with these and the trouble is apparently only beginning. Statistics point to alarming increases in ocean and air temperatures in the past three decades especially, and spikes in all extreme weather events. Just ask any insurance company how quickly the earth is becoming uninsurable.


David Titley, a former admiral with the U.S. Navy and director for the Center for Solutions to Weather and Climate Risk was at the meeting and was quoted as saying “It’s about people, not polar bears.” He questioned whether we will be able to adapt in time to the accelerating pace of extreme climate change and extreme weather events. There are already hundreds of millions of ‘climate refugees’ on earth.


A lab director at the U.S. National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment noted that most of our food crops and cattle are produced in mid-lattitudes that our now experiencing recurring droughts, or at the other extreme, floods. In 2003 Europe suffered a drought that claimed 70,000 lives. Maize production decreased by 30%. The fruit harvest was reduced by 25%. Grains and hay to feed animals dropped 30%. Wine production was the lowest in 10 years. For the money people out there, the total loss was 4 billion Euros. As the photos below show, Europe is far from being an isolated case.

Drought France, Brazil, Swiss, SpainDrought USA 2012 chartDrought China 2011 chart & photo

On top of droughts; fires, hurricanes, tsunamis and floods are increasing, because of imbalances like the the jet stream, as mentioned. And because thicker, polluted air now holds more moisture longer, then like a water balloon springing a leak, dumps a lot more precipitation over a smaller area, all of a sudden.

The photos in this blog are courtesy of the Climate Reality Project and also have attributions printed on them. They were mostly taken in the past 3 or 4 years, showing the catastrophic consequences of increasing extreme weather events. Is this just cyclical bad weather that will calm down soon?  No. Nothing in the data suggests that. Quite the opposite. This is the beginning of a continuously growing worldwide disaster.

Fires Vegas & Colorado 222Fires russia, brazil, australia copyCalifornia 333 copyPortugal & Spain copyPakistanIndia floodsChina & RussiaGermany 333Czech, Slovak, HungaryAustria & GreeceNA Cities 2012-13Philippines & ArgentinaHRRICANES 222Ice_Storm_by_NOAA_jpg_475x310_q85EXTREME SNOWWe’re all responsible for this: Governments who are stuck on oil and coal, and pretending natural gas will save us; the media that can’t distinguish between bogus science and real science, industry when it prefers the green photo op to real long term energy planning, you and I when we imagine we are powerless and continue to buy gas guzzling cars, oil furnaces and continue voting for governments that claim they are ‘managing the economy.’ In reality they permit the uncompensated destruction of  the only real resource on which any economy can be based, our planet.

You can do something about it. It’s never too late to start. Click here for solutions you can implement personally. It’s not someone else’s problem. It’s ours. It’s the defining issue of our era. Let’s not let anyone distract us with other priorities. Climate change is at the top of the list. Just look at the weather forecast. Outlook: Extreme.

Consumer decisions are very important

PriusBelow is  a link to two Globe and Mail reporters talking on video at the auto show about hybrid vehicles vs. conventional gas engines. They agree that hybrid cars are still priced $5000 or $6000 higher (although this gap is closing), but that they save fuel.

The more traditional reporter claims it will take up to 10 years to recover the differential in fuel savings and he’d rather bank the cash and avoid the hybrid. Short term thinking. Our society is still ruled by it.

The slightly more progressive gent says four years to recover the savings, so buy a hybrid or electric if you plan to keep the car 4-5 years because its economically smarter; plus he’s not really a tree hugger, ‘but there’s that too.”

You see even for progressive journalists it’s out of fashion in just four of the world’s countries for the media to talk about a problem that 100% of the world’s credible, science-journal-published scientists agree is the biggest crisis in the planet’s history, and the defining issue of our era. The reason it’s out of fashion is because in these four countries (USA, UK, Canada, Australia) the profession of carbon-lobbyist pays well. Out of work journalists can work as freelancers, sowing just enough doubt to cause their colleagues in the media to continue to use the assinine phrase: “the climate debate.” In fact, there is no debate; hasn’t been for years. Only out-of-step, sloppy, aging journalists still use this phrase.

National governments, who have never been known to lead, but rather to follow; take their cues from bad journalists because national governments are led by politicians who only read briefings, and the media is able to simplify the language of scientists for them, like a briefing. So national governments drag their feet, making our progression to the new energy age slow and, ironically, damaging the future-readiness of our economies.

This discussion between the Globe reporters epitomizes the issues facing the mainstream consumer in this world, relative to the worsening climate change problem and imminent increases in non-renewable energy costs. Make the right decision and vote with our wallets. Buy a Prius or a Leaf or Volt now; or a Tesla if you can afford more. If buying in 2016 or 2017 wait for the new affordable Tesla sedan. Within about 3 years, there won’t even be a ‘debate’ about which car to buy. Just like the ‘debate’ about solar energy is now over.

Here’s the link:

The Sun and the Moon

jfk 3300px-Barack_Obama_speaks_at_Nellis_AFB_2009-05-27_2Google and its CEO Larry Page are promoting an exciting concept about growing businesses and advancing societies called “moonshot thinking.” It is named in part for the inspirational moment when John F. Kennedy said that America would shoot for the moon, even though it had no idea how it would get there. Page says this is the only way to change the world. In business it means don’t create a strategy to improve by 10%, build one to improve by 1000%, or to expand by 10 times.

According to the solar industry is doing something along these lines. The site reports that solar jobs are being added in the USA ten times faster than average national employment growth. These are local jobs. These are jobs in a business that has a trajectory clearly indicating a promising future.

Many of our top decision-makers are business leaders or the politicians who listen to them. It’s time for those decision-makers to recognize that the future is here already. If you truly care about building tomorrow’s economy, it’s time to recognize what that really means. Click here to read more about this.

Take New York City and Multiply it by 6 Times – That’s the Size of the Tar Sands Disaster

Neil Young is fighting with the tar sands people about a music tour he gave with David Suzuki to draw attention to the mess near neil_young & David SuzukiFortMcMurray. The celebrities and the oil industry each accuse one another of misinformation. The photos below tell some of the story. At full capacity there will be about 40 or 50 mines near Fort McMurray, occupying an area about 6 times the size of New York. Except for the first two photos, each photo below generally shows operations at just one of these mines.

According to the Post Carbon Institute the tar sands produce 475 million gallons of toxic waste each day, (which is nine times as much oil as they produce). Unlined tailings ponds are said to leak 3 million gallons of toxic waste each and every day. An accident at Suncor on March 25, 2013, caused 350,000 litres in 10 hours of ‘process-affected’ water to leak into the Athabasca River. The company said its test showed a ‘negligible effect’ on the water.

The government didn’t buy it and conducted its own tests. According to, during the experiment, rainbow trout are placed in a tank with the untreated solution. If 50% of the fish die, it is considered a failure. Although the province did not release how many rainbow trout died, a government blog post did confirm that the water had failed the test. The tests found traces of arsenic, chloride, ammonia and several other toxic chemicals at levels exceeding acceptable limits in Alberta’s Surface Water Guidelines. This led to the revelation that there are bigger problems in this regard. Suncor reportedly failed a government toxicity test 39 times since the 2011 and in 2013 was told to clean up its act with Athabaca leaks immediately.

Overview SyncrudeoverviewSuncor at AthabascaOverview with lake

The yellow stuff shown in these photos is sulphur, which creates acid rain. Syncrude piles it up into ‘mountains’ or plateaus as shown. Each plateau is about twice the size of a soccer field. One of Syncrude’s mines has four of these plateaus. A Syncrude sulphur mountain smaller2Tar sands deforestation2
Tailing pond tar sands2Tailings pond2Arkansas ruptureYoung and Suzuki pointed out that the tar sands violates native treaty rights and that cancer levels have zoomed up in the area. For a while the oil lobby brought in it’s own ‘medical experts’ to try to complicate the findings about cancer, until government undertook studies to clarify and verify.

One of the photos here is not of the tar sands, but instead, of a residential community in Arkansas where a pipeline ruptured last year causing the evacuation of 22 homes. It was carrying tar sands crude oil to the Texas coast.

I’m an environmentalist, but I’m also a pragmatist. It’s unhelpful to think oil will disappear overnight, but it’s way more unhelpful to pretend we don’t have a problem or even aggressively spread misinformation about it. Change is difficult and slow enough. Oil people should be willing to shut up when they are being legitimately attacked.

On the other hand, we’re all hypocrites. More than 90% of our homes and cars still run on fossil fuels. So if we’re not part of the solution, we’re part of the problem. Just because change is slow or the problem seems distant from our everyday world, does not make it someone else’s problem. More than ever, each of us needs to proactively focus on solutions and help bring our world into a new energy age. Please click here to see what you could be doing.

Clean Tech Matures

solar grauatesClint Wilder, writing in says:

Solar power’s maturation has clearly reached the “fight” stage; it’s big enough to be taken seriously. There’s a wealth of statistics to choose from to show solar’s growth in the boom year of 2013. In the first 10 months of the year, utility-scale solar accounted for 21 percent of all new generation capacity in the U.S.; in the month of October, it was 72 percent. And in an unprecedented court decision in the first week of 2014, a Minnesota judge ruled that utility-scale solar is a better investment for Xcel Energy’s expansion plan than new natural gas capacity.

Wind power, of course, has been big enough to be taken seriously for quite a while. The U.S. wind industry now finds itself in a new stage of its maturation: life without the federal production tax credit (PTC), which expired at the end of 2013. The industry has been there before, with disastrous results, but this time is different from the past boom-and-bust cycles of the 1990s and 2000s. I don’t think the PTC will ever return in its previous form; the industry will likely lobby for some type of tax subsidy as part of a more comprehensive federal tax reform package. Hopefully, that will include the long-overdue opening of master limited partnerships to investments in renewable energy projects, which would most likely be wind farms. Rather than its own PTC, that would allow wind power to enjoy at least some of the same treatment as fossil-fuel energy sources, which is just as it should be.

It’s easy to be part of the solution -just share this photo everywhere

Keep it SimplePlease share this photo broadly. Each of us is responsible. Climate change is not someone else’s problem. But it’s easy to overcome, because it’s only politics now, nothing else.

Be vocal. Vote wisely. Start now.

Paul Ruzycki & Alexandre Paul Coming Home from Russia


As a young man Paul Ruzycki dreamed of being a sailor and was ecstatic when he finally landed a job on one of the big ships on the Great Lakes. But he was horrified when his captain ordered him to dump garbage and toxins overboard. Paul refused and was fired. He later joined a GreenPeace ship and for the past couple of decades has fought courageously against those who unconscionably exploit and destroy our earth and waterways.

This year Paul Ruzycki, Alexandre Paul of Montreal and 28 other crew members were arrested following a peaceful protest near a Russian oil rig in the North Sea. They were jailed for months and later confined to St. Petersberg facing a ‘Hooliganism’charge, that could have seen them sentenced to 7 years in prison. (Two members of an all-girl pop band are now doing 2 years under the same law for making fun of Putin and the church).

Thanks to Audrey Depault with Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project, and also to Mike Schreiner of the Green Party of Ontario for helping GreenPeace to mobilize public support to try to get them both (and 28 others) home to their families for Christmas. Reports say charges have now been dropped and Alex will be home tomorrow and Paul a couple of days later.

Prediction: The Smart Money Avoids the Corporate Carbon Bubble


Shareholders will demand future-readiness

Shareholders will demand that executive teams begin listening to their insurance companies and consultants regarding fuel costs, wacky weather and the Carbon Bubble that will burst and create obsolete business models. Without a climate change corporate strategy and an exit strategy from carbon-based fuels, many companies are vulnerable to quickly becoming dinosaurs. Everything happens faster in the stock market these days. You can lose value overnight that took years to build. Shareholders will demand strategic readiness to prevent this.

Natural gas denial will end

Energy companies are still pretending that they can cut fracking costs enough to justify the low cost of natural gas; but shareholders will soon catch on and say,“These wells are overhyped and drying up early. They’re hurting profits.” Acceptance will take place quietly because the whole reason for the magical fracking boom was that Washington and T. Boone Pickens needed a PR program to wipe the smirk off the faces of OPEC, and rationalize a cutback on Middle East war budgets; while creating the badly needed time window for the shift to renewables. As natural gas prices and other carbon fuels rise to reflect reality; solar, wind, geo, biomass and district solutions will enjoy even more explosive growth.

Longer-term corporate view

New corporate strategies will be accompanied by changes to executive compensation, which will begin to move away from the mirage of very short-term achievement bonuses. Boards of Directors will begin to look at 5 and 10-year strategies again. Companies with a lot of brick and mortar facilities will be forced to look at the costs of carbon fuels vs. renewables over the medium term. They will be pleasantly surprised to find they can save a great deal of money with relatively minor capital reallocations towards clean tech in building systems.

Walmart and big courier companies are laughing all the way to the bank with clean tech

With all the courier companies already saving loads of cash on greener fleets and the Walmarts and Empire State Buildings of the world saving a ton on building energy, it will no longer be possible to create doubt and rail against the future with any credibility. There will still be thousands of career climate-denier lobbyists in the four denier countries (USA, UK, Canada, Australia); but fossil fuel companies who want to have a future will be forced to start eliminating these lobbyist careers, investing less in BS propaganda, and more in strategic readiness.

Insurance companies will put the hammer down on companies ignoring the Carbon Bubble

As more companies acknowledge that fuel costs and wacky weather are just too dangerous, we will move towards a tipping point. Like they did with corporate health programs, insurance companies will take advantage of the timing and try to recover their losses on weather events, by further penalizing those who refuse to add a climate change strategy to their corporate strategies.

After share values are pummelled and silver-haired executive teams are embarrassed for their irrational energy and insurance costs, they will be forced to retire or incorporate climate change strategy. They will hire more young people to move their building energy systems and transport fleets towards clean tech.

Investors will complete the shift to clean tech

The investment shift towards clean tech has been undeniable. It hiccupped a bit recently with the last gasp of the climate damage denier lobbyists cranking up the fake science, and with the natural gas sham storyline. Once the truth manifests itself, investors will wake up and realize that the more future-oriented among them like Vesta, GE, and Tesla-Toyota have already made loads of cash. They will have no choice but to invest in the future too, rather than in the past.

More and bigger class action lawsuits against unethical corps

Those who peddle carbon, unhealthy food (and tobacco in the East), will face tougher and better-organized foes, that will sue them into the stone-age for the havoc they are wreaking on the planet and our health. With the rise of the internet there is no place to hide.

Bigger governments will finally catch up

Follow the money. Where corporations and investors go, national and regional governments eventually follow at a politically safe distance. They will acknowledge that corps and big pension plans have now joined local governments, small businesses and private citizens; who are all way ahead of the bigger governments on climate change solutions. Bigger governments will finally enact simple polluters-pay legislation, and/or continue to level the playing field between fossil fuels and renewables when it comes to government strategic investment and incentives.

Citizens must ramp up their support for future-readiness

The shift will not be completed if we don’t keep up the pressure. Remember it’s not someone else’s problem. It’s up to each of us as individuals to make the world a better place. Thankfully it’s not that hard and it’s not as complicated as some would have you believe. You can take that from me. I’ve spent the past dozen years studying world-wide clean tech viability and renewables economics, and publishing detailed technical articles on both, in respected journals.

7 Ways We Make the World Green in 2014

Click here to learn the 7 simple things you can do to make the world a better place next year and beyond. Make it a resolution to save money now and improve the lives of your children and grandchildren. And have a Happy and Green 2014.



Happy Holidays


Be vocal. Vote wisely. Start now.Earth modified SMALLER

It’s not difficult and it’s not complicated. Let’s not be confused about how to solve climate change. We need governments to act. We don’t need better inventions. We’ve already got most of the tech we’ll need. We don’t need complex laws either. Just some honesty.

1. Governments: Forget all the crap and trade, carbon credit mumbo jumbo. It’s very simple. Polluters pay. They’re destroying our home. They must pay. Tell  government leaders they’ll pay too (in the next election)  if they don’t tackle this now. Be vocal. Vote wisely. Start now.

2. Conservation in Buildings: Save a lot of money by insulating your building to the max. Google “passive house” and learn the truth about heating & cooling. You don’t even need a furnace, or air conditioning.

3. Heating & Cooling in Buildings: Install solar tech, geothermal, distict heating & cooling. Insist that banks and utilities finance it. They work for you. Tell governments to either stop giving your tax dollars to fossil fuel companies, or give more to you for clean tech. They also work for you.

4. Energy: Tell your governments to move away from fossil fuel based electricity generation. Quit wasting vast quantities of public money on highly dangerous nuke budget overruns. We can build a cheaper, clean energy solar farm in 24 months, instead of 16 years. Stop whining about windmills. Oil spills are uglier. This is the new reality!

5. Transportation: Stop making excuses and buy an electric car. Put two panels on your garage roof to power it. You’ll save thousands every year on gas. These vehicles are no more problematic than any car. Don’t believe the crap you read.

6. Public Transit: It’s easy to understand that a train carries a lot more people with less energy than a bunch of cars congested together. Transit investment should be near the top of your city’s priority list. Insanely, it’s not. Why not?

7. Business: Do you know what is the fastest growing business in the world? Duh, It’s clean tech. Make money. Click here. Is your pension plan investing in clean tech? What’s the world’s biggest looming financial risk for businesses? Insurers say, not planning for climate change.

Don’t be confused. Recycling and cycling and organic food are all great. Lots of emerging inventions will become helpful. But serious change demands action now on the 7 items above.


The weather has gone completely wacky. The North Pole and Greenland are melting. Glaciers that feed rivers for hundreds of millions of us are vapourizing. What’s complicated about this? Wake up! It’s time to get serious about climate change. It’s time to act. Take individual responsibility. It’s not someone else’s problem.

Be vocal. Vote wisely. Start now.

How NOT to be an environmentalist

eric denhoffI read about a hydrogen bus program in Whistler being scrapped by the city there. I personally think this is one of those technologies where the hype has sometimes outpaced the reality. I’m not close enough to the technology to say whether development has been too slow, but it seems like many years of waiting for the breakthrough, despite loads of money. In this case they studied the buses for several years, didn’t get the hydrogen network promised and had to ship it in, creating a 300% cost compared to diesel. They also had plenty of breakdowns. Pretty bad execution for a new tech demo; but the worst, by far, is the comment reportedly made by Eric Denhoff, president of the Canadian Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association to the Globe and Mail.

Instead of quietly accepting that they were given a decent chance to show off their advances, instead of acknowledging they screwed up, instead of quietly valuing the the lessons they learned; he lashed out against his partners with rhetoric. This is not the way to advance change and it gives environmentalists a bad name. The city is struggling and they simply can’t continue to spend triple the budget. Lots of environmental initiatives are highly cost effective. We should expect a preference for these and just a dabbling in the more risky ones. Denhoff should expect the same, be thankful for what he got and be quiet.

You can read what he should NOT have said here:

This is hilarious from Bill Maher

Please take a few minutes to review the inimitable logic of one of the world’s wisest wisecrackers.

Please World, Wake up to the Futility of Nuclear Energy


Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) has admitted that things are much more serious at their damaged nuclear facility than they have revealed in the past. Around 300 tonnes of highly radioactive water has leaked from a storage tank; and there are 1,000 similar tanks on site. These 1,000 tanks are believed to be at around 85% of their capacity and every day an extra 400 tonnes of radioactive water are being produced by the ailing plant and added to the tanks.


In addition 270,000 litres per day are leaking into ground water beneath the site and then into the ocean.

The BBC quoted a reputable independent consultant as saying that radioactive water is also leaking out of basements and cracks all over the site and there are no accurate figures for radiation levels.

Japan’s nuclear regulation chief Shunichi Tanaka says he fears there will be further leaks. Japan needs help from the international community, but apparently it does not like to ask for it.


Once a nuclear plant is built it supposedly provides a lot of power very inexpensively, but the truth is coming out. The USA Congressional Budget Office says the actual cost of building 75 nuclear power plants in the U.S. exceeded industry quoted estimates by more than 300 percent (actual cost about $3000 per kW not including waste storage).

In 2007 Moody’s Investor Service increased estimates to $5,000-$6,000 per kW and Keystone Center researchers found surprisingly high operating costs of 30 cents per kW. A proposed new Florida project was quoted at $8000 per kW in 2008.

It takes something like 16 years from conception to operation, allowing costs to mushroom and making the whole exercise a bit moot in today’s accelerating energy innovation environment. Waste-to-energy, biomass CHP, big wind and huge solar farms are all more competitive and much quicker to build. Due to chronic overruns, investors stopped taking cost estimates for new nuke plants seriously around 1980.

Is this Photoshop?



Photographer Zak Noyle from Honolulu’s Surfer Magazine travelled more than 40 hours        –8 hours by boat, 12 hours driving and nearly 24 hours flying– to reach what he was told was a pristine surfer’s paradise. He and his crew then shot these photos of surfer Dede Suryana (pictured) and of the shoreline area without Dede. Apparently Indonesian cities don’t have very advanced garbage collection and a lot of it just goes straight into the river. Noyle described it as a ‘wake-up call for us all.’ D’ya think?


Al Gore Adds 1250 Team Members & More Resources

ag_aboutSome 1250 high quality communicators from 70+ countries and all 50 USA States attended training in Chicago this week for Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project (CRP). I was privileged to be among them. We will join an existing team of more than 5,000 Climate Leaders worldwide.


Gore announced that the international Climate Reality Project will significantly boost resources in the coming months behind campaigns designed to:

• Maintain the momentum of the world majority who want climate action

• Counter what Gore referred to as the state of paralysis in some areas created by the ‘Deniers  Industry” (lobbyists) which now exists in just 4 countries: Canada, USA, UK and Australia.

Canadians returned Friday with renewed determination to turn up the heat on politicians, corporations and anyone else who chooses to ignore what scientists and other experts have been saying for years about

  • Climate change
  • Health
  • The fossil fuel economy
  • Extreme weather events

CRP ballroom


Gore also said a coming massive media blitz will focus on the true cost of carbon in our economy in dollars and cents. He pointed out the danger to companies who refuse to recognize this cost. When governments move to punish polluters these companies will be seriously devalued and their shareholders and directors will suffer. Share prices will drop and insurance companies are already urging companies to include climate change in their operating strategies or face coverage gaps.

CPR CEO Maggie Fox announced that the organization will widely promote campaigns to pressure deniers on numerous media and social media fronts; and will establish a new set of awards ‘recognizing’ the leaders in the climate change denial business. “We will name and shame,” any organization that engages in creating doubt about a reality that is accepted by 98% of the world’s scientists,” she said.

Trying to speak the language of business

Please share these 3 videoclips with as many business people, shareholders and investors as you can. Trying to speak the language of people in different groups who can help accelerate change.


Venture Capital Investors

Business people


Germany: Proof of Concept

If anyone is waiting to see whether it’s feasible for a country to depend heavily on clean renewables for its energy needs, the German model is now undeniably successful.


According to renewable energy 22% of Germany’s electricity supply is supplied by renewables. The government estimates this will increase to 40% within 7 years. As impressive as this projection may be, some describe it as conservative. On sunny and windy days, wind and solar meet more than 85% of the country’s mid-day electricity needs.

By 2015, the report suggests, the total cost for power produced by wind and solar will be roughly 7–10 euro cents per kilowatt hour, about the same as electricity generated by new gas and coal powered plants.

Germany’s economy is the strongest in Europe, it exports electricity to France, and it shut down 1/3 of its nuclear reactors during 2011.

Germany’s renewables sector provides 386,000 domestic jobs, and a recent independent poll showed 93% of Germans support the clean energy switch. High levels of windmill nimby-based resistance have apparently been easing in most regions. See the full report at Germany.

On the other hand, the government has attempted to allow solar to survive on its own merits and reduced feed-in tariffs at perhaps an inopportune time. China has been flooding world markets with cheap panels, making it difficult for manufacturers elsewhere to compete. Solon, one of Germany’s biggest producers was forced to file for bankruptcy.

Webisode Comedy About Green People

I hope you will agree this experimental (3 minute webisodes) online comedy about green people and sustainability is cool. Here are the first three webisodes of The World is Flat; about sustainable living at the Provincial Environment Ministry. Enjoy!

new pic

Please show your support by liking it, re-tweeting it or even crowd funding it at

Twitter: @BFNagy

Day of reckoning for shale believers is finally here

President Obama believed him, wealthy international investors believed him, even Wall Street believed him for a little while, but the house of cards built by the high priest of shale gas is all tumbling down now. A few weeks ago the poster boy for the USA shale gas miracle, Aubrey McClendon, was forced to retire as head of Chesapeake Energy; the fracking behemoth he founded, but could never make profitable.

aubrey mcclendon

His retirement was not likely caused by Matt Damon’s movie Promised Land, or numerous scientists questioning the environmental negatives of shale gas fracking. McClendon was skewered instead by his own industry. It turns out fracking cannot provide 100 more years of shale gas, but instead perhaps 20. But that will only be true if the industry can find a way to make itself profitable and thus keep its sugar daddy investors content.

These revelations made by energy experts and money people began a few years ago, but the Chesapeake PR machine seemed to achieve some success by discrediting decent people like Deborah Rogers and Arthur Berman. More recently Forbes and the Rolling Stone did highly detailed exploratories, which were followed by SEC investigations into borrowing practices at over-leveraged Chesapeake.

I’m an environmentalist, but equally a pragmatist. Fracking is almost certainly bad for chemistry in water and methane all over the place; and it might even be wrong to say natural gas is some kind of lesser evil than coal, but the most unfortunate sin Aubrey committed is pretending that fracking makes money, when it doesn’t. This has done, and will eventually do an incredible amount of damage to the increasingly battered fossil fuel industry. Sadly McClendon has hurt the rest of us too.

It’s a fiasco. Like the ethanol fiasco. Like some of the mistakes the wind industry keeps making. Because of the nature of change and innovation and free enterprise, these fiascos are to some extent unavoidable. But we need to work very hard to avoid them. They discourage investors and governments from trying ‘new’ things. They create a deadly state of paralysis.

Changing our energy landscape is hard enough without people letting excessive greed and pride and fear cloud the issues. We all know that in the long run our energy mix will change. The question from an environmentalist point of view is will it change in time to preserve some of the beauty and health that is still offered by our planet? The question from a capitalist point of view is can I make money while helping the planet?

In my world, both of these are reasonable questions from valued players. I’m a realist. It’s the people who know how to put money together, that really make things happen in this world. So environmentalists need to cool the rhetoric and guide our money people in the right directions, by speaking their language. Remind them over and over that clean tech will be a 4 trillion dollar industry in about 6 or 7 years (Pembina said recently 3 trillion -still big); that it has already outperformed almost everything else during the downturn. There is money to be made from the sun and the wind.

Remind them that their existing businesses can experience share price growth and bigger dividends in the short term, 3 years or less, just by hiring someone to look at corporate energy conservation. The savings are massive and it’s low hanging fruit!

Money people need our guidance and they are often as powerful or more powerful than governments in shaping change. Let’s steer them away from the fiascos, toward better investments. Let’s work on this together.

Green is a Conservative Idea

Not Enough Tories and Republicans Are Paying Attention

Bruce Nagy


I just do not understand today’s conservatives. Why are many of you ignoring the modern way to make money? Clean tech represents one of the few guaranteed investment gold mines for capitalists, and conservation makes this a double whammy of Tory goodness.

Clean Tech will be $4.4 trillion in about 6-1/2 years

There are a whole pack of people quietly raking it in with clean tech, which is a $2.2 trillion business worldwide right now, and is expected to mushroom to about twice that during the next seven years. Its growth has outpaced almost everything during the downturn, on average 12% since 2007.

According to Bloomberg and the United Nations, global investment in renewable power and fuels increased 17% to a new record of $257 billion last year. USA investment leapt 57% to $51 billion. In 2010 China was the leader, investing $48 billion.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) says global wind power capacity increased by an average annual growth rate of more than 25% over the past five years. Photovoltaic solar has grown more than 50% each year since 2006. The IEA’s 2012 World Energy Outlook projects a 300%-400% increase in electricity from renewables by 2035, based on information from oil companies and its member states, the largest countries in the world. Eventually renewables are expected to provide half the world’s energy or more.

The Tree-Huggers Are Now the Fat Cats

The world’s largest producer of wind energy, Spain-based Iberdrola SA, blew way analysts’ expectations last year with a whopping $4 billion in profits. Year over year investment growth for solar in Canada was 65% from 2005-2010. In the USA, solar employed more than 100,000 people in 2010-2011 compared with 82,500 for the coal industry.

Renewables technologies are increasingly profitable. In 2011 PV module prices fell by close to 50%, and onshore wind turbine prices dropped by 10%. Through district heating and cooling projects, geothermal capital costs are dropping, making levelized costs for geo more attractive.

Conservation and Building Efficiency

Analysts all agree that mechanical system retrofits in existing buildings will be a huge business for the next 10 years at least. According to the UK’s Grantham Research Institute, increasing insulation, draft-proofing, installing good-quality double-glazed windows and switching to more efficient appliances and lighting will save at least 10% on energy in residential retrofits and 25% in non-residential retrofits.

This is very real, big money. The Building Owners and Managers Association of Canada can provide years of perfectly documented case studies showing millions in savings. If you want a piece of the action, conservatives need to first recognize that this is the new business era we live in.

Nuclear Should be Frightening for Conservatives

It’s time to tell the truth. Nukes just make the richest labour unions richer. The USA Congressional Budget Office says the cost of building the last 75 nuclear plants in the U.S. exceeded estimates by more than 300%. So, actual cost was about $3000 per kW not including waste storage. Basically, business cases for nukes are not what thinking capitalists should admire.

In 2007 Moody’s Investor Service increased estimates to $5,000-$6,000 per kW and Keystone Center researchers found surprisingly high operating costs of 30 cents per kW. A proposed new Florida project was quoted at $8000 per kW in 2008. It takes something like 16 years from conception to operation, allowing costs to mushroom, and making the whole exercise a bit moot in today’s accelerating energy innovation environment. There are a lot of options that conservatives should look at instead, which are now very proven, all more competitive and much quicker to build.

In Canada in the Province of Ontario, one study showed that for 50% of the cost of a new nuclear reactor we could instead retrofit 1.6 million homes and save the same amount of energy. How can a conservative ignore a saving of half the cost? The study also showed it would create 90 times more modern-skilled jobs for our young people.

Mayor Ford and the Best Business in the World

I worked as chief of staff for a Toronto city councillor and got to know the now famous or infamous Mayor Ford. I won’t comment on his political missteps, but I will say that some of his ideas are not bad. One day his chief strategist asked for a meeting, I guess because he heard we had some green cred. The strategist told me in the meeting that green is a conservative concept, because it saves so much money and it will continue to be the best business in the world for the next few decades. He’s absolutely right.

Toronto is in the Province of Ontario. Last year I was talking to the President of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, Allan O’Dette. You would probably have to describe him as a conservative. He agreed that the best strategy to revive the suffering Ontario manufacturing sector is to encourage development of clean tech.

It’s time for the rest of the conservatives out there to wake up and get in on the clean tech gold mine.